
RADEON 9500

RADEON X300SE
RADEON 9500 vs RADEON X300SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON 9500 vs RADEON X300SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON 9500 vs RADEON X300SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON 9500
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌198.3% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
RADEON X300SE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 214.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅RADEON 9500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X300SE is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9500 vs RADEON X300SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9500
The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

RADEON X300SE
The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 scores 36 versus the RADEON X300SE's 38 — the RADEON X300SE leads by 5.6%. The RADEON 9500 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON X300SE uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON 9500) vs 1,408 (RADEON X300SE). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 36 | 38+6% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1645 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9500 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X300SE carries 512 MB. RADEON X300SE gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 and 64-bit on the RADEON X300SE. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (RADEON 9500) vs 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) — the RADEON X300SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9500 draws 95W versus the RADEON X300SE's 100W — a 5.1% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500) vs 350W (RADEON X300SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-5% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON 9500 came in at $179, while the RADEON X300SE launched at $60. On MSRP, RADEON X300SE was 66.5% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (RADEON 9500) vs 0.6 (RADEON X300SE) — the RADEON X300SE offers 200% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X300SE (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | $60-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.6+200% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Navi 14 |
| Release | September 29 2015 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #420 | #336 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














