RADEON 9500
VS
GeForce FX 5700

RADEON 9500 vs GeForce FX 5700

AMD

RADEON 9500

2015Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700

2010Core: 732 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9500 is positioned at rank 737 and the GeForce FX 5700 is on rank 367, so the GeForce FX 5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9500

#727
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
54285%
#729
49210%
#730
49080%
#734
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
44630%
#735
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
44325%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
100%
#738
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
100%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
80%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
75%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
50%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
50%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
40%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
30%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
30%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
25%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
20%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
20%
#750
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
15%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
15%
#752
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
15%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5700

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
34543%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
33186%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
32800%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
32743%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
32676%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
32490%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
32081%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
31962%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
31667%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
31581%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
31200%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
31133%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
30571%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
30552%
#352
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
38095%
#367
GeForce FX 5700
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
100%
#368
RADEON X800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $20
95%
#369
RADEON X800 XL
MSRP: $349|Avg: $15
95%
#370
RADEON 9600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
86%
#371
RADEON X800 PRO
MSRP: $399|Avg: $15
76%
#372
GeForce FX 5200LE
MSRP: $43|Avg: $25
76%
#373
GeForce FX 5200SE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
57%
#374
GeForce FX 5200
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
52%
#375
RADEON 9800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $30
52%
#376
GeForce PCX 5300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
48%
#377
GeForce FX 5900
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
43%
#378
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
43%
#379
GeForce FX 5100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
38%
#380
GeForce FX 5600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
33%
#381
GeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
33%
#382
GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
14%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce FX 5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9500.

InsightRADEON 9500GeForce FX 5700
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-13.9%)
Leading raw performance (+13.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce FX 5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 127.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRADEON 9500GeForce FX 5700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+127.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 and GeForce FX 5700

AMD

RADEON 9500

The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700

The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 scores 36 versus the GeForce FX 5700's 41 — the GeForce FX 5700 leads by 13.9%. The RADEON 9500 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce FX 5700 uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON 9500) vs 480 (GeForce FX 5700). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700).

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce FX 5700
G3D Mark Score
36
41+14%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Rankine
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+327%
480
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS+192%
1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
40+25%
TMUs
128+113%
60
L1 Cache
512 KB
960 KB+88%
L2 Cache
512 KB
640 KB+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce FX 5700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9500 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB. The GeForce FX 5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON 9500) vs 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) — the GeForce FX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce FX 5700
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
640 KB+25%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9500 draws 95W versus the GeForce FX 5700's 219W — a 79% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce FX 5700
TDP
95W-57%
219W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.4+100%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9500 launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce FX 5700 launched at $199 and now averages $15. The GeForce FX 5700 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (RADEON 9500) vs 2.7 (GeForce FX 5700) — the GeForce FX 5700 offers 125% better value. The RADEON 9500 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce FX 5700
MSRP
$179-10%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$15-50%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
2.7+125%
Codename
Amethyst
GF110
Release
September 29 2015
December 7 2010
Ranking
#420
#497