GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce FX 5700
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
GeForce FX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 55146.3% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+55146.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-55146.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2080.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce FX 5700.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2080.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce FX 5700
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
GeForce FX 5700
The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GeForce FX 5700's 41 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 55146.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce FX 5700 uses Rankine, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 480 (GeForce FX 5700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+55146% | 41 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Rankine |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+807% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1470% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+20% | 40 |
| TMUs | 136+127% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+357% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+4979% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce FX 5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce FX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce FX 5700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+3100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+4979% | 0.63 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+36% | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 4.6+207% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce FX 5700's 219W — a 31.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-27% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+70700% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce FX 5700 launched at $199 and now averages $15. The GeForce FX 5700 costs 96.1% less ($365 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.7 (GeForce FX 5700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 2107.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $199-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $15-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+2107% | 2.7 |
| Codename | AD106 | GF110 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #59 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce FX 5700
