RADEON 9500
VS
GeForce PCX 5750

RADEON 9500 vs GeForce PCX 5750

AMD

RADEON 9500

2015Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5750

2010Core: 732 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9500 is positioned at rank 737 and the GeForce PCX 5750 is on rank 366, so the GeForce PCX 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9500

#727
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
54285%
#729
49210%
#730
49080%
#734
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
44630%
#735
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
44325%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
100%
#738
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
100%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
80%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
75%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
50%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
50%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
40%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
30%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
30%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
25%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
20%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
20%
#750
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
15%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
15%
#752
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
15%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
31539%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
30300%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
29948%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
29896%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
29835%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
29665%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
29291%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
29183%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
28913%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
28835%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
28487%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
28426%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
27913%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
27896%
#351
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
34783%
#366
GeForce PCX 5750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
100%
#367
GeForce FX 5700
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
91%
#368
RADEON X800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $20
87%
#369
RADEON X800 XL
MSRP: $349|Avg: $15
87%
#370
RADEON 9600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
78%
#371
RADEON X800 PRO
MSRP: $399|Avg: $15
70%
#372
GeForce FX 5200LE
MSRP: $43|Avg: $25
70%
#373
GeForce FX 5200SE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
52%
#374
RADEON 9800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $30
48%
#375
GeForce FX 5200
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
48%
#376
GeForce PCX 5300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
43%
#377
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
39%
#378
GeForce FX 5900
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
39%
#379
GeForce FX 5100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
35%
#380
GeForce FX 5600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
30%
#381
GeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
30%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON 9500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5750.

InsightRADEON 9500GeForce PCX 5750
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce PCX 5750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce PCX 5750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 94.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRADEON 9500GeForce PCX 5750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+94.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 and GeForce PCX 5750

AMD

RADEON 9500

The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce PCX 5750

The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

The RADEON 9500 scores 36 and the GeForce PCX 5750 reaches 35 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON 9500 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON 9500) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce PCX 5750
G3D Mark Score
36+3%
35
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+327%
480
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS+192%
1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
40+25%
TMUs
128+113%
60
L1 Cache
512 KB
960 KB+88%
L2 Cache
512 KB
640 KB+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce PCX 5750
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON 9500) vs 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce PCX 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce PCX 5750
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
640 KB+25%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9500 draws 95W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 79% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce PCX 5750
TDP
95W-57%
219W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
100mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
0.4+100%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9500 launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 and now averages $15. The GeForce PCX 5750 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (RADEON 9500) vs 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce PCX 5750 offers 91.7% better value. The RADEON 9500 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureRADEON 9500GeForce PCX 5750
MSRP
$179
$150-16%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$15-50%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
2.3+92%
Codename
Amethyst
GF110
Release
September 29 2015
December 7 2010
Ranking
#420
#497