GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce PCX 5750
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
GeForce PCX 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce PCX 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 90122.9% higher G3D Mark score and 9500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5750.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+90122.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-90122.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2193.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce PCX 5750.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2193.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce PCX 5750
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 35 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 90122.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+90123% | 35 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+1500% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+2753% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80+100% | 40 |
| TMUs | 240+300% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+698% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+7519% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce PCX 5750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce PCX 5750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5750 has 128 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 9500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+9500% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+7519% | 0.63 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+33% | 9.0a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+207% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs None (GeForce PCX 5750). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs None. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | None |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 26.2% difference. The GeForce PCX 5750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 285mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 219W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 285mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+55300% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 and now averages $15. The GeForce PCX 5750 costs 97.5% less ($575 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 2226.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $150-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $15-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+2226% | 2.3 |
| Codename | AD104 | GF110 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #11 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce PCX 5750
