
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 422.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅9.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅66.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 240).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌400.6% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation reaches 30,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 240 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+4% | 30,269 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680 | 12800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+63% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+2% | 2550 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 176+120% |
| TMUs | 240 | 400+67% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 12.5 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 100+67% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 400+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation carries 32 GB. RTX 5000 Ada Generation gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 576 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 13.1% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 250W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 650W-7% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 121.1+9% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti came in at $799, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti was 80% cheaper ($3201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 419.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-80% | $4000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+420% | 7.6 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #11 | #16 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














