
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 793.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅21.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅83.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌776% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 and the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell reaches 30,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) with 240 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+2% | 30,968 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680 | 14080+83% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS | 66.94 TFLOPS+67% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+10% | 2377 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 176+120% |
| TMUs | 240 | 440+83% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 13.8 MB+84% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 110+83% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 440+83% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell carries 48 GB. RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — a 103.2% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and 384-bit on the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+103% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 5.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-5% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 650W-7% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+7% | 103.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti came in at $799, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti was 88.6% cheaper ($6200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.4 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 797.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-89% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+798% | 4.4 |
| Codename | AD104 | GB202 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #11 | #13 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














