
RADEON 9500
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9500 is positioned at rank 737 and the GeForce FX 5900 is on rank 377, so the GeForce FX 5900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5900.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5900 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 45.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+45.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 and GeForce FX 5900

RADEON 9500
The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

GeForce FX 5900
The GeForce FX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON 9500 scores 36 and the GeForce FX 5900 reaches 35 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON 9500 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce FX 5900 uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON 9500) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 36+3% | 35 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+229% | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON 9500) vs 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900) — the GeForce FX 5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9500 draws 95W versus the GeForce FX 5900's 365W — a 117.4% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-74% | 365W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 218mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+300% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9500 launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce FX 5900 launched at $399 and now averages $20. The GeForce FX 5900 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (RADEON 9500) vs 1.8 (GeForce FX 5900) — the GeForce FX 5900 offers 50% better value. The RADEON 9500 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-55% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $20-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 1.8+50% |
| Codename | Amethyst | GF110 |
| Release | September 29 2015 | March 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #420 | #555 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















