Quadro FX 1000 vs RADEON 9500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1000 vs RADEON 9500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1000 vs RADEON 9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1000

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
179.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
❌98.9% higher power demand at 189W vs 95W.

RADEON 9500

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 195.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 189W, a 94W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.9% in PassMark G3D (36 vs 34), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $321 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 195.8% (0.2 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 9500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1000 vs RADEON 9500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1000

The Quadro FX 1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON 9500

The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1000 scores 34 versus the RADEON 9500's 36 — the RADEON 9500 leads by 5.9%. The Quadro FX 1000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON 9500 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1000) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9500). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1000) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500).

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON 9500
G3D Mark Score	34	36+6%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	2048+753%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+558%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	128+60%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON 9500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1000 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1000) vs 512 KB (RADEON 9500) — the RADEON 9500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON 9500
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1000 draws 189W versus the RADEON 9500's 95W — a 66.2% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1000) vs 350W (RADEON 9500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON 9500
TDP	189W	95W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.4+100%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1000 came in at $500, while the RADEON 9500 launched at $179. On MSRP, RADEON 9500 was 64.2% cheaper ($321 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (Quadro FX 1000) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9500) — the RADEON 9500 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9500 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON 9500
MSRP	$500	$179-64%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.2+100%
Codename	GT200B	Amethyst
Release	November 11 2008	September 29 2015
Ranking	#815	#420

Search Quadro FX 1000 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.