GeForce FX 5900 vs Quadro FX 1000

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900

2011Core: 607 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1000

2008Core: 610 MHz

GeForce FX 5900 vs Quadro FX 1000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5900 vs Quadro FX 1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5900 vs Quadro FX 1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5900

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 29% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • βœ…More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010βˆ’2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌93.1% higher power demand at 365W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 1000

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 189W instead of 365W, a 176W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    25.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5900 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (35 vs 34), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5900 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5900 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 29% (0.1 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5900 vs Quadro FX 1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900

The GeForce FX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 Γ—2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1000

The Quadro FX 1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX 5900 scores 35 and the Quadro FX 1000 reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5900 is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 1000 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1000). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS Γ—2 (GeForce FX 5900) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1000).

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Quadro FX 1000
G3D Mark Score
35+3%
34
Architecture
Rankine
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1024 Γ—2+327%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS Γ—2+100%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
48 Γ—2+50%
32
TMUs
64 Γ—2
80+25%
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5900 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Quadro FX 1000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5900 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1000. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1000) β€” the GeForce FX 5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Quadro FX 1000
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5900 draws 365W versus the Quadro FX 1000's 189W β€” a 63.5% difference. The Quadro FX 1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Quadro FX 1000
TDP
365W
189W-48%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
218mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.2+100%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5900 came in at $399, while the Quadro FX 1000 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5900 was 20.2% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5900) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1000) β€” the Quadro FX 1000 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5900 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Quadro FX 1000
MSRP
$399-20%
$500
Performance per Dollar
0.1
0.1
Codename
GF110
GT200B
Release
March 24 2011
November 11 2008
Ranking
#555
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.