
GeForce 6200

GeForce FX 5900
GeForce 6200 vs GeForce FX 5900 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6200 vs GeForce FX 5900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6200 vs GeForce FX 5900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 227% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅GeForce FX 5900 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 6200 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 365W, a 355W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce FX 5900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌209.3% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌3550% higher power demand at 365W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6200 vs GeForce FX 5900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

GeForce FX 5900
The GeForce FX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6200 scores 37 versus the GeForce FX 5900's 35 — the GeForce 6200 leads by 5.7%. The GeForce 6200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce FX 5900 uses Rankine, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6200) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 37+6% | 35 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Rankine |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+56% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 ×2+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 1 MB+614% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5900 carries 128 MB. GeForce 6200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6200 and 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5900. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6200) vs 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900) — the GeForce FX 5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6200) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.1+40% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6200 draws 10W versus the GeForce FX 5900's 365W — a 189.3% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6200) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 218mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-97% | 365W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 218mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7+3600% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6200 came in at $129, while the GeForce FX 5900 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 6200 was 67.7% cheaper ($270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GeForce 6200) vs 0.1 (GeForce FX 5900) — the GeForce 6200 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 6200 (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 6200 | GeForce FX 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-68% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3+200% | 0.1 |
| Codename | GP108B | GF110 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | March 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #643 | #555 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














