GeForce FX 5900
VS
Radeon Xpress 1300M

GeForce FX 5900 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900

2011Core: 607 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Xpress 1300M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5900 is positioned at rank 377 and the Radeon Xpress 1300M is on rank 363, so the Radeon Xpress 1300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5900

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
80600%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
77433%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
76533%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
76400%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
76244%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
75811%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
74856%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
74578%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
73889%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
73689%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
72800%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
72644%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
71333%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
71289%
#361
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
88889%
#376
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
100%
#377
GeForce FX 5900
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
100%
#378
GeForce FX 5100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
89%
#379
GeForce FX 5600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
78%
#380
GeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
78%
#381
GeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $5
33%
#382
GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
33%
#383
GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP: $299|Avg: $49
22%
#384
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
22%
#385
GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP: $179|Avg: $15
22%
#386
GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
22%
#387
GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
22%
#388
RADEON 7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
22%
#389
GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP: $349|Avg: $49
11%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M

#348
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18016%
#363
Radeon Xpress 1300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
99%
#365
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
98%
#366
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
98%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
96%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
95%
#369
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
95%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
87%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
83%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
80%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
79%
#374
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
74%
#375
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
74%
#376
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
74%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
73%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon Xpress 1300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5900 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5900.

InsightGeForce FX 5900Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-14.3%)
Leading raw performance (+14.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Xpress 1300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5900 and Radeon Xpress 1300M

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900

The GeForce FX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Radeon Xpress 1300M

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5900 scores 35 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the Radeon Xpress 1300M leads by 14.3%. The GeForce FX 5900 is built on Rankine while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Radeon Xpress 1300M
G3D Mark Score
35
40+14%
Architecture
Rankine
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1024 ×2
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS ×2
3.2 TFLOPS+157%
ROPs
48 ×2+50%
32
TMUs
64 ×2
80+25%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Radeon Xpress 1300M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5900 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M has 512 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce FX 5900) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Radeon Xpress 1300M
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Radeon Xpress 1300M
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5900 draws 365W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 124.4% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Radeon Xpress 1300M
TDP
365W
85W-77%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
218mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.5+400%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce FX 5900Radeon Xpress 1300M
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Codename
GF110
Navi 14
Release
March 24 2011
November 13 2019
Ranking
#555
#403