GeForce FX 5900
VS
RADEON 9500

GeForce FX 5900 vs RADEON 9500

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900

2011Core: 607 MHz
VS
AMD

RADEON 9500

2015Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5900 is positioned at rank 377 and the RADEON 9500 is on rank 737, so the GeForce FX 5900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5900

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
80600%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
77433%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
76533%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
76400%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
76244%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
75811%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
74856%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
74578%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
73889%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
73689%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
72800%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
72644%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
71333%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
71289%
#361
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
88889%
#376
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
100%
#377
GeForce FX 5900
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
100%
#378
GeForce FX 5100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
89%
#379
GeForce FX 5600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
78%
#380
GeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
78%
#381
GeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $5
33%
#382
GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
33%
#383
GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP: $299|Avg: $49
22%
#384
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
22%
#385
GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP: $179|Avg: $15
22%
#386
GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
22%
#387
GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
22%
#388
RADEON 7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
22%
#389
GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP: $349|Avg: $49
11%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9500

#727
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
54285%
#729
49210%
#730
49080%
#734
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
44630%
#735
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
44325%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
100%
#738
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
100%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
80%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
75%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
50%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
50%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
40%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
30%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
30%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
25%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
20%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
20%
#750
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
15%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
15%
#752
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
15%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON 9500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5900.

InsightGeForce FX 5900RADEON 9500
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce FX 5900 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5900 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 45.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce FX 5900RADEON 9500
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+45.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5900 and RADEON 9500

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900

The GeForce FX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

RADEON 9500

The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX 5900 scores 35 and the RADEON 9500 reaches 36 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5900 is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9500 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9500). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500).

FeatureGeForce FX 5900RADEON 9500
G3D Mark Score
35
36+3%
Architecture
Rankine
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024 ×2
2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS ×2
4.096 TFLOPS+229%
ROPs
48 ×2+50%
32
TMUs
64 ×2
128+100%
L1 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5900RADEON 9500
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900) vs 512 KB (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce FX 5900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900RADEON 9500
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5900 draws 365W versus the RADEON 9500's 95W — a 117.4% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5900) vs 350W (RADEON 9500). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce FX 5900RADEON 9500
TDP
365W
95W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
218mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.4+300%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce FX 5900 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the RADEON 9500 launched at $179 and now averages $30. The GeForce FX 5900 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.8 (GeForce FX 5900) vs 1.2 (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce FX 5900 offers 50% better value. The RADEON 9500 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce FX 5900RADEON 9500
MSRP
$399
$179-55%
Avg Price (30d)
$20-33%
$30
Performance per Dollar
1.8+50%
1.2
Codename
GF110
Amethyst
Release
March 24 2011
September 29 2015
Ranking
#555
#420