Quadro FX 1000 vs RADEON X300SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1000 vs RADEON X300SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1000 vs RADEON X300SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1000

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (34 vs 38).
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
733.3% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

RADEON X300SE

2020

Why buy it

✅+11.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 831.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Quadro FX 1000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X300SE is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X300SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 11.8% in PassMark G3D (38 vs 34), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X300SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X300SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $440 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 831.4% (0.6 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro FX 1000 vs RADEON X300SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1000

The Quadro FX 1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

RADEON X300SE

The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1000 scores 34 versus the RADEON X300SE's 38 — the RADEON X300SE leads by 11.8%. The Quadro FX 1000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON X300SE uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1000) vs 1,408 (RADEON X300SE). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1000) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE).

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON X300SE
G3D Mark Score	34	38+12%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	240	1408+487%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	4.632 TFLOPS+645%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	88+10%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON X300SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1000 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X300SE carries 512 MB. RADEON X300SE gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1000 and 64-bit on the RADEON X300SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1000) vs 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) — the RADEON X300SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON X300SE
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1000 draws 189W versus the RADEON X300SE's 100W — a 61.6% difference. The RADEON X300SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1000) vs 350W (RADEON X300SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON X300SE
TDP	189W	100W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.4+100%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1000 came in at $500, while the RADEON X300SE launched at $60. On MSRP, RADEON X300SE was 88% cheaper ($440 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (Quadro FX 1000) vs 0.6 (RADEON X300SE) — the RADEON X300SE offers 500% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X300SE (2020 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1000	RADEON X300SE
MSRP	$500	$60-88%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.6+500%
Codename	GT200B	Navi 14
Release	November 11 2008	May 28 2020
Ranking	#815	#336

Search Quadro FX 1000 on Amazon

Search RADEON X300SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.