
Quadro FX 1000

Radeon X1200
Quadro FX 1000 vs Radeon X1200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 1000 vs Radeon X1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 1000 vs Radeon X1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 1000
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌525% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.
Radeon X1200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 506.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Quadro FX 1000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1200 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 1000 vs Radeon X1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1000
The Quadro FX 1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon X1200
The Radeon X1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1000 scores 34 and the Radeon X1200 reaches 33 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1000 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1200 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1000) vs 384 (Radeon X1200). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1000) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1200).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1000 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34+3% | 33 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+26% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1000 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1000 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1200 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1200 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1000 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1200. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1000) vs 128 KB (Radeon X1200) — the Quadro FX 1000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1000 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1000 draws 189W versus the Radeon X1200's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon X1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1000) vs 350W (Radeon X1200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1000 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.7+250% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 1000 came in at $500, while the Radeon X1200 launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon X1200 was 84% cheaper ($420 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (Quadro FX 1000) vs 0.4 (Radeon X1200) — the Radeon X1200 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1200 (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1000 | Radeon X1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $80-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.4+300% |
| Codename | GT200B | Polaris 24 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #815 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














