
GeForce PCX 5750

RADEON 9500
GeForce PCX 5750 vs RADEON 9500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce PCX 5750 vs RADEON 9500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce PCX 5750 vs RADEON 9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce PCX 5750
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌130.5% higher power demand at 219W vs 95W.
RADEON 9500
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 219W, a 124W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌19.3% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce PCX 5750 vs RADEON 9500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.

RADEON 9500
The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce PCX 5750 scores 35 and the RADEON 9500 reaches 36 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce PCX 5750 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the RADEON 9500 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9500). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35 | 36+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 2048+327% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+192% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 128+113% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce PCX 5750 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5750 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 512 KB (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce PCX 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5750 draws 219W versus the RADEON 9500's 95W — a 79% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 350W (RADEON 9500). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 95W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.4+100% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce PCX 5750 came in at $150, while the RADEON 9500 launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce PCX 5750 was 16.2% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9500) — the RADEON 9500 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9500 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-16% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Codename | GF110 | Amethyst |
| Release | December 7 2010 | September 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #497 | #420 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














