CPU
GPU
GeForce PCX 5750
Popular choices:
RADEON 9500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce PCX 5750 is positioned at rank 366 and the RADEON 9500 is on rank 737, so the GeForce PCX 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5750.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce PCX 5750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce PCX 5750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 94.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+94.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce PCX 5750 and RADEON 9500
GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
RADEON 9500
The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce PCX 5750 scores 35 and the RADEON 9500 reaches 36 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce PCX 5750 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the RADEON 9500 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9500). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35 | 36+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 2048+327% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+192% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 128+113% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 512 KB (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce PCX 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5750 draws 219W versus the RADEON 9500's 95W — a 79% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 350W (RADEON 9500). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 95W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.4+100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the RADEON 9500 launched at $179 and now averages $30. The GeForce PCX 5750 costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 1.2 (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce PCX 5750 offers 91.7% better value. The RADEON 9500 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | RADEON 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-16% | $179 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3+92% | 1.2 |
| Codename | GF110 | Amethyst |
| Release | December 7 2010 | September 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #497 | #420 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce PCX 5750 and RADEON 9500
