
GeForce PCX 5750

Quadro FX 1300
GeForce PCX 5750 vs Quadro FX 1300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce PCX 5750 vs Quadro FX 1300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce PCX 5750 vs Quadro FX 1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce PCX 5750
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 311.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌15.9% higher power demand at 219W vs 189W.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Quadro FX 1300
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 189W instead of 219W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌299.3% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce PCX 5750 vs Quadro FX 1300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro FX 1300
The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce PCX 5750 scores 35 and the Quadro FX 1300 reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce PCX 5750 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro FX 1300 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1300). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35+3% | 34 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+100% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+126% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 80+33% |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce PCX 5750 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5750 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1300. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1300) — the GeForce PCX 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0a |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5750 draws 219W versus the Quadro FX 1300's 189W — a 14.7% difference. The Quadro FX 1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 189W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce PCX 5750 came in at $150, while the Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce PCX 5750 was 75% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1300) — the GeForce PCX 5750 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce PCX 5750 (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-75% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2+100% | 0.1 |
| Codename | GF110 | GT200B |
| Release | December 7 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #497 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














