
GeForce PCX 5750

MOBILITY RADEON X300
GeForce PCX 5750 vs MOBILITY RADEON X300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce PCX 5750 vs MOBILITY RADEON X300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce PCX 5750 vs MOBILITY RADEON X300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce PCX 5750
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌338% higher power demand at 219W vs 50W.
MOBILITY RADEON X300
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 191.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 219W, a 169W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce PCX 5750 vs MOBILITY RADEON X300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.

MOBILITY RADEON X300
The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce PCX 5750 scores 35 and the MOBILITY RADEON X300 reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce PCX 5750 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X300). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X300).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35+3% | 34 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+25% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+50% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+1100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce PCX 5750 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5750 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X300. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X300) — the GeForce PCX 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X300). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.0+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5750 draws 219W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X300's 50W — a 125.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.7+250% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce PCX 5750 came in at $150, while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 launched at $50. On MSRP, MOBILITY RADEON X300 was 66.7% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 0.7 (MOBILITY RADEON X300) — the MOBILITY RADEON X300 offers 250% better value.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $50-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.7+250% |
| Codename | GF110 | Broadway |
| Release | December 7 2010 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #497 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














