A6-7400K vs Core i5-10400F

CPU

GPU

A6-7400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Buy on Amazon

A6-7400K vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum

A6-7400K

2 / 2

1,678

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

+676.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7400K vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7400K vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7400K

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $59 less on MSRP ($101 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,678 vs 13,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($101 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +323.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 390.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $101 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌
58.4% HIGHER MSRP
$160 MSRPvs$101 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7400K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than A6-7400K?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 323.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 676.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 323.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 676.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in 58.4% more expensive on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $101 MSRP, and it still gives you a 323.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 390.1% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 16.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7400K vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7400K

The A6-7400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,678 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7400K packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A6-7400K versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A6-7400K uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7400K scores 1,678 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 154.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F.

Feature	A6-7400K	Core i5-10400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+21%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1024 kB+300%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	1,678	13,029+676%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,191
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,783

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7400K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A6-7400K versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7400K) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).

Feature	A6-7400K	Core i5-10400F
Socket	FM2+	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866	DDR4-2666+43%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-7400K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A6-7400K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The A6-7400K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A6-7400K rivals Pentium G3420; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	A6-7400K	Core i5-10400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R5 Graphics	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6-7400K was priced at $101, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($101 vs $160), A6-7400K was $59 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-7400K delivers 16.6 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 132.2% better value option.

Feature	A6-7400K	Core i5-10400F
MSRP	$101-37%	$160
Performance per Dollar	16.6	81.4+390%
Release Date	2014	2020

Search A6-7400K on Amazon

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.