A6-7470K vs Celeron G1840

A6-7470K vs Celeron G1840 Performance Spectrum

A6-7470K

2 / 2

1,799

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G1840

2 / 2

1,784

0.0%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7470K vs Celeron G1840 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7470K vs Celeron G1840: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7470K

2016

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron G1840.

Trade-offs

❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

Celeron G1840

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,784 vs 1,799).
❌Launch MSRP is still $35 MSRP, while A6-7470K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-7470K.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7470K better than Celeron G1840?

Yes. A6-7470K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-7470K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-7470K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-7470K is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-7470K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $35 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1840 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (51.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7470K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7470K vs Celeron G1840 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7470K

The A6-7470K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,799 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-7470K and Celeron G1840 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A6-7470K versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the A6-7470K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A6-7470K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G1840 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7470K scores 1,799 against the Celeron G1840's 1,784 — a 0.8% lead for the A6-7470K.

Feature	A6-7470K	Celeron G1840
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4 GHz+43%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+32%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1024 kB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,799	1,784
Geekbench 6 Single	—	488
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	832

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7470K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1840 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7470K versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1840 — the A6-7470K supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7470K) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1840).

Feature	A6-7470K	Celeron G1840
Socket	FM2+	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-7470K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A6-7470K) vs VT-x (Celeron G1840). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 Graphics (A6-7470K) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1840) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-7470K rivals Pentium G4400; Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240.