A6 PRO-7400B vs Core Duo T2500

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core Duo T2500 Performance Spectrum

A6 PRO-7400B

2 / 2

1,640

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Duo T2500

2 / 2

1,621

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core Duo T2500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core Duo T2500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 PRO-7400B

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Core Duo T2500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2500

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,621 vs 1,640).
❌No integrated graphics, while A6 PRO-7400B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 PRO-7400B better than Core Duo T2500?

Yes. A6 PRO-7400B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6 PRO-7400B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6 PRO-7400B is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6 PRO-7400B still makes the most sense overall. A6 PRO-7400B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6 PRO-7400B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core Duo T2500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 PRO-7400B

The A6 PRO-7400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $69.

Core Duo T2500

The Core Duo T2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,621 points. Launch price was $120.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6 PRO-7400B and Core Duo T2500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A6 PRO-7400B versus 2 GHz on the Core Duo T2500 — a 64.4% clock advantage for the A6 PRO-7400B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6 PRO-7400B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core Duo T2500 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6 PRO-7400B scores 1,640 against the Core Duo T2500's 1,621 — a 1.2% lead for the A6 PRO-7400B.

Feature	A6 PRO-7400B	Core Duo T2500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+95%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+75%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	2 MB+100%
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,640+1%	1,621

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 PRO-7400B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6 PRO-7400B versus DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2500 — the A6 PRO-7400B supports 179.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6 PRO-7400B supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6 PRO-7400B) vs 0 (Core Duo T2500) — the A6 PRO-7400B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6 PRO-7400B	Core Duo T2500
Socket	FM2+	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+180%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+1500%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6 PRO-7400B) / VT-x (Core Duo T2500). The A6 PRO-7400B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Core Duo T2500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Duo T2500 targets Mobile.