A8-3530MX vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
A8-3530MX
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-3530MX is positioned at rank 763 and the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is on rank 549, so the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-3530MX
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-3530MX | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-3530MX | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-3530MX and Celeron Dual-Core T1500
A8-3530MX
The A8-3530MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,608 points. Launch price was $90.
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.87 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,625 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A8-3530MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3530MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A8-3530MX versus 1.87 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 — a 32.7% clock advantage for the A8-3530MX. The A8-3530MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3530MX scores 1,608 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1500's 1,625 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1500.
| Feature | A8-3530MX | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+39% | 1.87 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,608 | 1,625+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 278 | — |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8-3530MX versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 — the A8-3530MX supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-3530MX supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3530MX) vs 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1500) — the A8-3530MX offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A8-3530MX | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3530MX) vs No (Celeron Dual-Core T1500). The A8-3530MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3530MX targets Mainstream Laptop, Celeron Dual-Core T1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-3530MX rivals Core i5-2430M; Celeron Dual-Core T1500 rivals Pentium T2390.
| Feature | A8-3530MX | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6620G | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | No |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A8-3530MX and Celeron Dual-Core T1500
