A8-3530MX vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

A8-3530MX vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Performance Spectrum

A8-3530MX

4 / 4

1,608

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

4 / 4

1,615

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3530MX vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3530MX vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3530MX

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6620G, while VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,608 vs 1,615).
❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3530MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 better than A8-3530MX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A8-3530MX is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 still makes the most sense overall. VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3530MX vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3530MX

The A8-3530MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,608 points. Launch price was $90.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in 12 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNQ (2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.47 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,615 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A8-3530MX and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A8-3530MX versus 1.47 GHz on the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 — a 55.5% clock advantage for the A8-3530MX (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The A8-3530MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses CNQ (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3530MX scores 1,608 against the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700's 1,615 — a 0.4% lead for the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.

Feature	A8-3530MX	VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+77%	1.47 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+58%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	32 nm-20%	40 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	CNQ (2011)
PassMark	1,608	1,615
Geekbench 6 Single	278	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3530MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-3530MX	VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Socket	FS1	NanoBGA2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3530MX) / not specified (VIA Nano QuadCore L4700). The A8-3530MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3530MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3530MX rivals Core i5-2430M.