A8-3530MX
VS
Celeron G1820T

A8-3530MX vs Celeron G1820T

AMD

A8-3530MX

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron G1820T

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-3530MX is positioned at rank 763 and the Celeron G1820T is on rank 500, so the Celeron G1820T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3530MX

#751
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1095%
#752
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1079%
#753
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
990%
#754
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
986%
#755
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
977%
#757
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
943%
#758
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
904%
#759
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
903%
#760
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
879%
#763
A8-3530MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#767
Core i7-1250U
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
#773
Core i7-9750HF
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1820T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7797%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7367%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5349%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1611%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1276%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1117%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
640%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
631%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
575%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
575%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
568%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
553%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
545%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
543%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
538%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
98%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
98%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
97%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
96%
#500
Celeron G1820T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#501
Core i5-8600K
MSRP: $257|Avg: $100
99%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
97%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
96%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G1820T leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-3530MX is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA8-3530MXCeleron G1820T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-3530MXCeleron G1820T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-3530MX and Celeron G1820T

AMD

A8-3530MX

The A8-3530MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,608 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

The A8-3530MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G1820T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3530MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A8-3530MX versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T — a 8% clock advantage for the A8-3530MX (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A8-3530MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G1820T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3530MX scores 1,608 against the Celeron G1820T's 1,599 — a 0.6% lead for the A8-3530MX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 278 vs 415, a 39.5% lead for the Celeron G1820T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3530MX vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820T.

FeatureA8-3530MXCeleron G1820T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+8%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz+26%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,608
1,599
Geekbench 6 Single
278
415+49%
Geekbench 6 Multi
629
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3530MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1820T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Celeron G1820T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3530MX) vs 16 (Celeron G1820T) — the A8-3530MX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA8-3530MXCeleron G1820T
Socket
FS1
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3530MX) vs VT-x (Celeron G1820T). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 6620G (A8-3530MX) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3530MX targets Mainstream Laptop, Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-3530MX rivals Core i5-2430M; Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.

FeatureA8-3530MXCeleron G1820T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6620G
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop
Budget