A8-3530MX vs Celeron G1820T

A8-3530MX vs Celeron G1820T Performance Spectrum

A8-3530MX

4 / 4

1,608

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G1820T

2 / 2

1,599

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3530MX vs Celeron G1820T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3530MX vs Celeron G1820T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3530MX

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 54W, a 9W reduction.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (278 vs 415).

Celeron G1820T

2013

Why buy it

✅+49.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,599 vs 1,608).
❌20% higher power demand at 54W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-3530MX better than Celeron G1820T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1820T is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A8-3530MX pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-3530MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-3530MX still makes the most sense overall. A8-3530MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-3530MX vs Celeron G1820T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3530MX

The A8-3530MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,608 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3530MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G1820T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3530MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the A8-3530MX versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T — a 8% clock advantage for the A8-3530MX (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A8-3530MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G1820T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3530MX scores 1,608 against the Celeron G1820T's 1,599 — a 0.6% lead for the A8-3530MX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 278 vs 415, a 39.5% lead for the Celeron G1820T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3530MX vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820T.

Feature	A8-3530MX	Celeron G1820T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+8%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.4 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,608	1,599
Geekbench 6 Single	278	415+49%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	629

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3530MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1820T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8-3530MX versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820T — the A8-3530MX supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3530MX) vs 16 (Celeron G1820T) — the A8-3530MX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-3530MX	Celeron G1820T
Socket	FS1	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3530MX) vs VT-x (Celeron G1820T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6620G (A8-3530MX) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3530MX targets Mainstream Laptop, Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: A8-3530MX rivals Core i5-2430M; Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.