
A8-4555M
Popular choices:

Athlon X2 340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A8-4555M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 19W instead of 65W, a 46W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7600G, while Athlon X2 340 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 340.
Athlon X2 340
2012Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike A8-4555M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-4555M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,333 vs 1,341).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $30 MSRP, while A8-4555M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 19W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-4555M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
A8-4555M
2012Athlon X2 340
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 19W instead of 65W, a 46W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7600G, while Athlon X2 340 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike A8-4555M.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 340.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-4555M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,333 vs 1,341).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $30 MSRP, while A8-4555M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 19W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-4555M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A8-4555M better than Athlon X2 340?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A8-4555M | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A8-4555M | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A8-4555M | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A8-4555M | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-4555M and Athlon X2 340

A8-4555M
A8-4555M
The A8-4555M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,341 points. Launch price was $90.

Athlon X2 340
Athlon X2 340
The Athlon X2 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The A8-4555M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X2 340 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-4555M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-4555M versus 3.6 GHz on the Athlon X2 340 — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 340 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the A8-4555M scores 1,341 against the Athlon X2 340's 1,333 — a 0.6% lead for the A8-4555M.
| Feature | A8-4555M | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+50% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+300% | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,341 | 1,333 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 397 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 549 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-4555M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 340 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A8-4555M versus DDR3-1600 on the Athlon X2 340 — the A8-4555M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 340 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A8-4555M) and A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X2 340).
| Feature | A8-4555M | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP2 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+44333% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 32 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-4555M) vs AMD-V (Athlon X2 340). The A8-4555M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7600G), while the Athlon X2 340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X2 340 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-4555M rivals Core i3-2367M.
| Feature | A8-4555M | Athlon X2 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7600G | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













