RADEON HD6410D
VS
Radeon R5 A6-7480

RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 A6-7480

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016Core: 1120 MHzBoost: 1266 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON HD6410D is positioned at rank 340 and the Radeon R5 A6-7480 is on rank 86, so the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D

#330
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
898%
#332
814%
#333
812%
#337
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
738%
#338
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
733%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
100%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
94%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
92%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
92%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 A6-7480

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
364%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
350%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
346%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
345%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
345%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
343%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
338%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
337%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
334%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
333%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
329%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
328%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
322%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
322%
#71
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
402%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
73%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
72%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
69%
#86
Radeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
100%
#87
GeForce GT 710
MSRP: $35|Avg: $50
89%
#89
GeForce GT 740
MSRP: $89|Avg: $89
81%
#90
Radeon R7 A8-7680
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
79%
#92
Radeon HD 7730
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
78%
#93
Radeon 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
74%
#97
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
72%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
70%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
70%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
68%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON HD6410D is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The RADEON HD6410D likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 64.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON HD6410D.

InsightRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-64.8%)
Leading raw performance (+64.8%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $30 for the Radeon R5 A6-7480, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 264.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+264.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON HD6410D and Radeon R5 A6-7480

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 A6-7480

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON HD6410D scores 423 versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 697 — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 leads by 64.8%. The RADEON HD6410D is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 128 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1266 MHz.

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
G3D Mark Score
423
697+65%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
128
2304+1700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5632 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS+936%
Boost Clock
2200 MHz+74%
1266 MHz
ROPs
4
32+700%
TMUs
8
144+1700%
L1 Cache
32 KB
576 KB+1700%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON HD6410D draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6410D) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
TDP
15W-90%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Perf/Watt
28.2+513%
4.6
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 launched at $35 and now averages $30. The RADEON HD6410D costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 23.2 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 264.7% better value. The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP
$35
$35
Avg Price (30d)
$5-83%
$30
Performance per Dollar
84.6+265%
23.2
Codename
Dragon Range
Ellesmere
Release
January 3 2023
June 29 2016
Ranking
#843
#305