
RADEON HD6410D
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 M230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON HD6410D is positioned at rank 340 and the Radeon R5 M230 is on rank 468, so the RADEON HD6410D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M230
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON HD6410D is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The RADEON HD6410D likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 M230 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 M230 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON HD6410D.
| Insight | RADEON HD6410D | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $25 for the Radeon R5 M230, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 397.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON HD6410D | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+397.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON HD6410D and Radeon R5 M230

RADEON HD6410D
The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

Radeon R5 M230
The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON HD6410D scores 423 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON HD6410D is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 423 | 425 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 1024+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON HD6410D comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 has 4 GB. The Radeon R5 M230 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON HD6410D draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6410D) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 28.2+395% | 5.7 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80 and now averages $25. The RADEON HD6410D costs 80% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 17.0 (Radeon R5 M230) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 397.6% better value. The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | RADEON HD6410D | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-56% | $80 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-80% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.6+398% | 17.0 |
| Codename | Dragon Range | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 3 2023 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #843 | #522 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













