RADEON HD6410D
VS
Radeon R5 M230

RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 M230

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M230

2015

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON HD6410D is positioned at rank 340 and the Radeon R5 M230 is on rank 468, so the RADEON HD6410D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D

#330
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
898%
#332
814%
#333
812%
#337
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
738%
#338
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
733%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
100%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
94%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
92%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
92%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M230

#458
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2045%
#460
1853%
#461
1849%
#465
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1681%
#466
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1669%
#468
Radeon R5 M230
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
100%
#469
Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#470
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#471
Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
98%
#472
Radeon HD 8280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#473
GeForce GTX 850A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
96%
#474
96%
#475
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#476
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: $118
96%
#477
95%
#479
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
MSRP: $699|Avg: $150
94%
#480
Radeon R5 M330
MSRP: $120|Avg: $20
94%
#481
Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
94%
#482
Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
93%
#483
GeForce GTX 760A
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON HD6410D is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The RADEON HD6410D likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 M230 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 M230 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON HD6410D.

InsightRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 M230
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $25 for the Radeon R5 M230, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 397.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 M230
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+397.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON HD6410D and Radeon R5 M230

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M230

The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.

Graphics Performance

The RADEON HD6410D scores 423 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON HD6410D is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 M230
G3D Mark Score
423
425
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
128
1024+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 M230
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON HD6410D comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 has 4 GB. The Radeon R5 M230 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 M230
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON HD6410D draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6410D) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 M230
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Mobile
Perf/Watt
28.2+395%
5.7
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80 and now averages $25. The RADEON HD6410D costs 80% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 17.0 (Radeon R5 M230) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 397.6% better value. The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureRADEON HD6410DRadeon R5 M230
MSRP
$35-56%
$80
Avg Price (30d)
$5-80%
$25
Performance per Dollar
84.6+398%
17.0
Codename
Dragon Range
Pitcairn
Release
January 3 2023
June 9 2015
Ranking
#843
#522