RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 M230

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 M230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 M230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $45 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 127.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon R5 M230

2015

Why buy it

✅18.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
128.6% HIGHER MSRP
$80 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M230 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (425 vs 423), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON HD6410D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON HD6410D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $45 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 127.5% (12.1 vs 5.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 M230 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

RADEON HD6410D vs Radeon R5 M230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

Radeon R5 M230

The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON HD6410D scores 423 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON HD6410D is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	Radeon R5 M230
G3D Mark Score	423	425
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	128	1024+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	Radeon R5 M230
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON HD6410D has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M230 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RADEON HD6410D and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M230.

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	Radeon R5 M230
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON HD6410D draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6410D) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	Radeon R5 M230
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Mobile
Perf/Watt	28.2+395%	5.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON HD6410D came in at $35, while the Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80. On MSRP, RADEON HD6410D was 56.3% cheaper ($45 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.1 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 5.3 (Radeon R5 M230) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 128.3% better value. The newer card here is RADEON HD6410D (2023 vs 2015).

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	Radeon R5 M230
MSRP	$35-56%	$80
Performance per Dollar	12.1+128%	5.3
Codename	Dragon Range	Pitcairn
Release	January 3 2023	June 9 2015
Ranking	#843	#522

Search RADEON HD6410D on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M230 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.