GeForce 810M vs RADEON HD6410D
GeForce 810M
Popular choices:
RADEON HD6410D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 810M is positioned at rank 317 and the RADEON HD6410D is on rank 340, so the GeForce 810M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810M
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON HD6410D is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The RADEON HD6410D likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 810M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD6410D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 810M.
| Insight | GeForce 810M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON HD6410D remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 810M and RADEON HD6410D
GeForce 810M
The GeForce 810M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 420 points.
RADEON HD6410D
The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 810M scores 420 and the RADEON HD6410D reaches 423 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 810M is built on Maxwell while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 810M) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 810M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 810M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 420 | 423 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+200% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS+53% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 2200 MHz+96% |
| ROPs | 8+100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 16+100% | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 810M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 810M) vs 2 MB (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 810M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 810M draws 33W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 75% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 810M) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce 810M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 15W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.7 | 28.2+122% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 810M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $35 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $5 |
| Codename | GM108 | Dragon Range |
| Release | March 12 2014 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #854 | #843 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 810M and RADEON HD6410D
