
FirePro M2000

GeForce 810M
FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 810M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 810M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 810M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M2000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌30.3% higher power demand at 43W vs 33W.
GeForce 810M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 43W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 810M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

GeForce 810M
The GeForce 810M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 420 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the GeForce 810M reaches 420 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 810M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 384 (GeForce 810M). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 810M).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426+1% | 420 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+19% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+150% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 810M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 810M carries 512 MB. FirePro M2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M2000 and 128-bit on the GeForce 810M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M2000) vs 1 MB (GeForce 810M) — the GeForce 810M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 810M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 (11_0)+8% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce 810M). Decoder: UVD 3 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 810M).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the GeForce 810M's 33W — a 26.3% difference. The GeForce 810M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (GeForce 810M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W | 33W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 12.7+28% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 810M (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Codename | Heathrow | GM108 |
| Release | July 1 2012 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #710 | #854 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














