Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 710A

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro M2000

2012Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 710A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 710A Performance Spectrum

FirePro M2000
1 GB 43
426
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6410D
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5165
brand logoRadeon R5 310
brand logoRadeon HD 6490M
brand logoRadeon R9 M395X
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce 710A
2 GB 33
433
+1.6%
brand logoGeForce GT 220
brand logoGeForce 510
brand logoGeForce GT 610
brand logoGeForce GTX 260M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 710A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M2000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    757.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
  • ❌30.3% higher power demand at 43W vs 33W.

GeForce 710A

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $265 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 771.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 43W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 710A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (433 vs 426), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 710A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $265 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 771.2% (12.4 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 710A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M2000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 710A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M2000

The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 710A

The GeForce 710A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 433 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the GeForce 710A reaches 433 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 710A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 384 (GeForce 710A). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 710A).

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 710A
G3D Mark Score
426
433+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+67%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS+42%
0.7227 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
160 KB
192 KB+20%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 710A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 710A
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 710A carries 2 GB. GeForce 710A gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M2000 and 128-bit on the GeForce 710A. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M2000) vs 1 MB (GeForce 710A) — the GeForce 710A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 710A
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 710A). Vulkan: None vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 710A
DirectX
11.1
12 (11_0)+8%
Vulkan
None
1.0
OpenGL
4.2
4.6+10%
Max Displays
6+200%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs NVENC (GeForce 710A). Decoder: UVD 3 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 710A).

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 710A
Encoder
UVD 3
NVENC
Decoder
UVD 3
NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the GeForce 710A's 33W — a 26.3% difference. The GeForce 710A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (GeForce 710A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 710A
TDP
43W
33W-23%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-24%
85
Perf/Watt
9.9
13.1+32%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M2000 came in at $300, while the GeForce 710A launched at $35. On MSRP, GeForce 710A was 88.3% cheaper ($265 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (FirePro M2000) vs 12.4 (GeForce 710A) — the GeForce 710A offers 785.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 710A (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 710A
MSRP
$300
$35-88%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
12.4+786%
Codename
Heathrow
GM108
Release
July 1 2012
March 13 2015
Ranking
#710
#810
Search FirePro M2000 on AmazonSearch GeForce 710A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.