
FirePro M2000
Popular choices:

GeForce 710A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M2000 is positioned at rank 323 and the GeForce 710A is on rank 335, so the FirePro M2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 710A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 710A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M2000.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 710A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $62), it costs 19% less, resulting in a 22% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 710A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($62) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M2000 and GeForce 710A

FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

GeForce 710A
The GeForce 710A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 433 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the GeForce 710A reaches 433 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 710A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 384 (GeForce 710A). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 710A).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 710A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426 | 433+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+42% | 0.7227 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 710A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M2000 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 710A has 2 GB. The GeForce 710A offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M2000) vs 1 MB (GeForce 710A) — the GeForce 710A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 710A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 710A). Vulkan: None vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 710A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 (11_0)+8% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs NVENC (GeForce 710A). Decoder: UVD 3 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 710A).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 710A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the GeForce 710A's 33W — a 26.3% difference. The GeForce 710A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (GeForce 710A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 710A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W | 33W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 13.1+32% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M2000 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce 710A launched at $35 and now averages $62. The FirePro M2000 costs 19.4% less ($12 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (FirePro M2000) vs 7.0 (GeForce 710A) — the FirePro M2000 offers 21.4% better value. The GeForce 710A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce 710A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $35-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-19% | $62 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5+21% | 7.0 |
| Codename | Heathrow | GM108 |
| Release | July 1 2012 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #710 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













