FirePro M2000 vs Quadro 410

FirePro M2000

2012Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 410

2013Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M2000 vs Quadro 410 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M2000 vs Quadro 410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M2000

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 43W instead of 100W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 101.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quadro 410

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 101.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 132.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 43W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 410 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (427 vs 426), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 410 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 101.8% (2.9 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 410 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M2000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M2000 vs Quadro 410 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M2000

The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the Quadro 410 reaches 427 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410).

FeatureFirePro M2000Quadro 410
G3D Mark Score
426
427
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
1152+80%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS
1.627 TFLOPS+59%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
96+140%
L1 Cache
160 KB+67%
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M2000Quadro 410
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 410 carries 512 MB. FirePro M2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M2000 and 64-bit on the Quadro 410. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M2000) vs 512 KB (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M2000Quadro 410
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 79.7% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro M2000Quadro 410
TDP
43W-57%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
9.9+130%
4.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M2000 came in at $300, while the Quadro 410 launched at $149. On MSRP, Quadro 410 was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (FirePro M2000) vs 2.9 (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 offers 107.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 410 (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M2000Quadro 410
MSRP
$300
$149-50%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
2.9+107%
Codename
Heathrow
GK104
Release
July 1 2012
July 23 2013
Ranking
#710
#604

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.