CPU
GPU
FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
Quadro 410
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M2000 is positioned at rank 323 and the Quadro 410 is on rank 251, so the Quadro 410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 410 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 410 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 410 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 100.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+100.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M2000 and Quadro 410
FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
Quadro 410
The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the Quadro 410 reaches 427 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426 | 427 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1152+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 1.627 TFLOPS+59% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 96+140% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+67% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M2000 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 410 has 512 MB. The FirePro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M2000) vs 512 KB (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 79.7% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-57% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9+130% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M2000 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro 410 launched at $149 and now averages $25. The Quadro 410 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (FirePro M2000) vs 17.1 (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 offers 101.2% better value. The Quadro 410 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $149-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $25-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 17.1+101% |
| Codename | Heathrow | GK104 |
| Release | July 1 2012 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #710 | #604 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M2000 and Quadro 410
