
FirePro M2000

Quadro 410
FirePro M2000 vs Quadro 410 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M2000 vs Quadro 410 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M2000 vs Quadro 410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M2000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 100W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌101.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quadro 410
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌132.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 43W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M2000 vs Quadro 410 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

Quadro 410
The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the Quadro 410 reaches 427 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426 | 427 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1152+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 1.627 TFLOPS+59% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 96+140% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+67% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 410 carries 512 MB. FirePro M2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M2000 and 64-bit on the Quadro 410. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M2000) vs 512 KB (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 79.7% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-57% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9+130% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M2000 came in at $300, while the Quadro 410 launched at $149. On MSRP, Quadro 410 was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (FirePro M2000) vs 2.9 (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 offers 107.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 410 (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $149-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 2.9+107% |
| Codename | Heathrow | GK104 |
| Release | July 1 2012 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #710 | #604 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














