FirePro M2000 vs RADEON HD6410D

CPU

GPU

FirePro M2000

2012Core: 800 MHz

RADEON HD6410D

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro M2000

426

+0.7%

Radeon HD 6410D

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

423

0.0%

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M2000 is positioned at rank 323 and the RADEON HD6410D is on rank 340, so the FirePro M2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000

#307

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

10404%

#322

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

100%

#323

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

100%

#324

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

98%

#325

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

97%

#326

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

96%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

96%

#328

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

94%

#329

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

92%

#330

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

91%

#331

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

90%

#333

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

89%

#334

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

89%

#335

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

89%

#336

Quadro FX 3450

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

88%

#337

GRID P40-24Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D

#330

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

898%

#332

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

814%

#333

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

812%

#337

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

738%

#338

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

733%

#340

RADEON HD6410D

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

100%

#341

GeForce 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

100%

#342

Radeon R7 M465X

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#344

GeForce 830A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

97%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

94%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

92%

#350

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

92%

#351

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

92%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON HD6410D is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The RADEON HD6410D likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro M2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON HD6410D.

Insight	FirePro M2000	RADEON HD6410D
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $50 for the FirePro M2000, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 893% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro M2000	RADEON HD6410D
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+893%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro M2000 Benchmark Check

RADEON HD6410D Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M2000 and RADEON HD6410D

FirePro M2000

The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the RADEON HD6410D reaches 423 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D).

Feature	FirePro M2000	RADEON HD6410D
G3D Mark Score	426	423
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	640+400%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS+82%	0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+300%	4
TMUs	40+400%	8
L1 Cache	160 KB+400%	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M2000	RADEON HD6410D
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M2000 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6410D has 512 MB. The FirePro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M2000) vs 2 MB (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M2000	RADEON HD6410D
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 96.6% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	FirePro M2000	RADEON HD6410D
TDP	43W	15W-65%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.9	28.2+185%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M2000 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 and now averages $5. The RADEON HD6410D costs 90% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (FirePro M2000) vs 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 895.3% better value. The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).