Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 800A

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro M2000

2012Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 800A

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 800A Performance Spectrum

FirePro M2000
1 GB 43
426
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6410D
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5165
brand logoRadeon R5 310
brand logoRadeon HD 6490M
brand logoRadeon R9 M395X
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce 800A
0.5 GB 33
435
+2.1%
brand logoGeForce GT 220
brand logoGeForce GT 520MX
brand logoGeForce GT 610
brand logoGeForce GTX 260M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 800A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M2000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    200% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌30.3% higher power demand at 43W vs 33W.

GeForce 800A

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 206.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 43W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 800A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (435 vs 426), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 800A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 206.3% (4.3 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 800A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M2000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M2000 vs GeForce 800A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M2000

The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 800A

The GeForce 800A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 435 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the GeForce 800A reaches 435 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 800A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 256 (GeForce 800A). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 800A).

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 800A
G3D Mark Score
426
435+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640+150%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS+74%
0.5888 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+150%
16
L1 Cache
160 KB+25%
128 KB
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 800A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 800A
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 800A carries 512 MB. FirePro M2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M2000 and 128-bit on the GeForce 800A. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M2000) vs 1 MB (GeForce 800A) — the GeForce 800A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 800A
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 800A). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 800A
DirectX
11.1
12 (11_0)+8%
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
4.2
4.6+10%
Max Displays
6+200%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs NVENC (GeForce 800A). Decoder: UVD 3 vs VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 800A).

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 800A
Encoder
UVD 3
NVENC
Decoder
UVD 3
VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the GeForce 800A's 33W — a 26.3% difference. The GeForce 800A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (GeForce 800A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 800A
TDP
43W
33W-23%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-24%
85
Perf/Watt
9.9
13.2+33%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M2000 came in at $300, while the GeForce 800A launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 800A was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (FirePro M2000) vs 4.3 (GeForce 800A) — the GeForce 800A offers 207.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 800A (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M2000GeForce 800A
MSRP
$300
$100-67%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
4.3+207%
Codename
Heathrow
GM108
Release
July 1 2012
July 22 2014
Ranking
#710
#832
Search FirePro M2000 on AmazonSearch GeForce 800A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.