CPU
GPU
FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8410G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M2000 is positioned at rank 323 and the Radeon HD 8410G is on rank 116, so the Radeon HD 8410G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8410G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8410G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8410G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8410G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8410G holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $50), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 921.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8410G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+921.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M2000 and Radeon HD 8410G
FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
Radeon HD 8410G
The Radeon HD 8410G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the Radeon HD 8410G reaches 435 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8410G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8410G). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8410G).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8410G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426 | 435+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+150% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8410G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M2000 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8410G has 512 MB. The FirePro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M2000) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8410G) — the Radeon HD 8410G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8410G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 8410G). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8410G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4+5% |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8410G). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 8410G).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8410G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the Radeon HD 8410G's 200W — a 129.2% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8410G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8410G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-79% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9+350% | 2.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M2000 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 8410G launched at $40 and now averages $5. The Radeon HD 8410G costs 90% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (FirePro M2000) vs 87.0 (Radeon HD 8410G) — the Radeon HD 8410G offers 923.5% better value.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8410G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $40-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $5-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 87.0+924% |
| Codename | Heathrow | Pitcairn |
| Release | July 1 2012 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #710 | #460 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M2000 and Radeon HD 8410G
