CPU
GPU
FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 420
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M2000 is positioned at rank 323 and the GeForce GT 420 is on rank 214, so the GeForce GT 420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 420
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 420 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M2000.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $79), it costs 37% less, resulting in a 55.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($79) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M2000 and GeForce GT 420
FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
GeForce GT 420
The GeForce GT 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the GeForce GT 420 reaches 432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 420 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 384 (GeForce GT 420). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 420).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426 | 432+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+34% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+400% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 420). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 (11_0)+8% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs None (GeForce GT 420). Decoder: UVD 3 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 420).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the GeForce GT 420's 64W — a 39.3% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 250W (GeForce GT 420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-33% | 64W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9+46% | 6.8 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M2000 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GT 420 launched at $79 and now averages $79. The FirePro M2000 costs 36.7% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (FirePro M2000) vs 5.5 (GeForce GT 420) — the FirePro M2000 offers 54.5% better value. The GeForce GT 420 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $79-74% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-37% | $79 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5+55% | 5.5 |
| Codename | Heathrow | GK107 |
| Release | July 1 2012 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #710 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M2000 and GeForce GT 420
