GeForce 810M
VS
GeForce GT 620M

GeForce 810M vs GeForce GT 620M

NVIDIA

GeForce 810M

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 620M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 810M is positioned at rank 317 and the GeForce GT 620M is on rank 192, so the GeForce GT 620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810M

#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
100%
#307
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
776%
#309
703%
#310
701%
#314
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
638%
#315
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
633%
#317
GeForce 810M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#320
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
99%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
98%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
97%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
96%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
92%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 620M

#182
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
377%
#184
342%
#185
341%
#189
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
310%
#190
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
308%
#192
GeForce GT 620M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
98%
#197
97%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
93%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 620M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 810M.

InsightGeForce 810MGeForce GT 620M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 620M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 810M and GeForce GT 620M

NVIDIA

GeForce 810M

The GeForce 810M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 420 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 620M

The GeForce GT 620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 810M scores 420 and the GeForce GT 620M reaches 432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 810M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 620M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 810M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 620M). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 810M) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620M). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 810MGeForce GT 620M
G3D Mark Score
420
432+3%
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS+18%
0.7296 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+18%
950 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB+500%
32 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 810MGeForce GT 620M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 810M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 620M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 620M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 810M) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 620M) — the GeForce 810M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 810MGeForce GT 620M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 810M) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 620M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce 810MGeForce GT 620M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (FL11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
None
OpenGL
4.6+12%
4.1
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce 810M) vs No (GeForce GT 620M). Decoder: NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 810M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620M).

FeatureGeForce 810MGeForce GT 620M
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
No
Decoder
NVDEC
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 810M draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 620M's 45W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 810M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 810M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 620M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 810MGeForce GT 620M
TDP
33W-27%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
12.7+32%
9.6