GeForce GT 710M vs RADEON HD6410D

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 710M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON HD6410D

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 710M vs RADEON HD6410D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 710M vs RADEON HD6410D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 710M vs RADEON HD6410D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 710M

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6410D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

  • 36.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON HD6410D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 710M instead at 431 vs 423, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON HD6410D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON HD6410D makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 710M vs RADEON HD6410D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 710M

The GeForce GT 710M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 431 points.

AMD

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 710M scores 431 and the RADEON HD6410D reaches 423 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 710M is built on Kepler while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 710M) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 710M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 710MRADEON HD6410D
G3D Mark Score
431+2%
423
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
384+200%
128
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS+32%
0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
967 MHz
2200 MHz+128%
ROPs
16+300%
4
TMUs
32+300%
8
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 710M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON HD6410D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 710MRADEON HD6410D
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 710M and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6410D. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 710M) vs 2 MB (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 710MRADEON HD6410D
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 710M draws 50W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 710M) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce GT 710MRADEON HD6410D
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
8.6
28.2+228%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON HD6410D (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 710MRADEON HD6410D
MSRP
$35
Codename
GK107
Dragon Range
Release
January 9 2013
January 3 2023
Ranking
#792
#843

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.