GeForce GT 420
VS
GeForce GT 710M

GeForce GT 420 vs GeForce GT 710M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 420

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 710M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 420 is positioned at rank 214 and the GeForce GT 710M is on rank 356, so the GeForce GT 420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 420

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1326%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1274%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1259%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1257%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1254%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1247%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1232%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1227%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1216%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1212%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1198%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1195%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1174%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1173%
#97
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
93%
#199
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1463%
#214
GeForce GT 420
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
100%
#215
GeForce GT 520
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
100%
#216
Radeon HD4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
100%
#217
GeForce GTX 275
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
99%
#219
Radeon HD 7400G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#220
Radeon HD 7480D
MSRP: $53|Avg: $30
97%
#221
Radeon HD 7520G
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
96%
#222
Radeon HD 8350G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#223
Radeon HD 6480G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#224
GeForce GT 415
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
94%
#225
Radeon HD 5550
MSRP: $75|Avg: $75
94%
#227
Radeon HD 6370D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
93%
#228
Radeon HD 7450
MSRP: $45|Avg: $12
91%
#229
Radeon HD 8470
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 710M

#346
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1007%
#348
913%
#349
911%
#353
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
828%
#354
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
822%
#356
GeForce GT 710M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
99%
#361
99%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
97%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
94%
#369
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
93%
#370
GeForce GT 730A
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 420 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 710M.

InsightGeForce GT 420GeForce GT 710M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 420 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 420 and GeForce GT 710M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 420

The GeForce GT 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 710M

The GeForce GT 710M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 431 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 420 scores 432 and the GeForce GT 710M reaches 431 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 420 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 710M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 420) vs 384 (GeForce GT 710M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 420) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 710M).

FeatureGeForce GT 420GeForce GT 710M
G3D Mark Score
432
431
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS+3%
0.7427 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 420GeForce GT 710M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 420 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 710M has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 420 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 420GeForce GT 710M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 420) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 710M). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce GT 420GeForce GT 710M
DirectX
12 (11_0)+9%
11.0
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
4.6+10%
4.2
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 420) vs No (GeForce GT 710M). Decoder: VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 420) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 710M).

FeatureGeForce GT 420GeForce GT 710M
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
VP4
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 420 draws 64W versus the GeForce GT 710M's 50W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce GT 710M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 420) vs 350W (GeForce GT 710M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 420GeForce GT 710M
TDP
64W
50W-22%
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
6.8
8.6+26%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 420 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 420GeForce GT 710M
MSRP
$79
Avg Price (30d)
$79
Codename
GK107
GK107
Release
May 29 2014
January 9 2013
Ranking
#777
#792