Quadro 410 vs RADEON HD6410D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 410 vs RADEON HD6410D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 410 vs RADEON HD6410D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 410

2013

Why buy it

✅20.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
325.7% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 321.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 410 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 410 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (427 vs 423), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON HD6410D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON HD6410D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $114 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 321.7% (12.1 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro 410 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro 410 vs RADEON HD6410D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 410 scores 427 and the RADEON HD6410D reaches 423 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 410 is built on Kepler while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro 410) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D).

Feature	Quadro 410	RADEON HD6410D
G3D Mark Score	427	423
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1152+800%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.627 TFLOPS+189%	0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+700%	4
TMUs	96+1100%	8
L1 Cache	96 KB+200%	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 410	RADEON HD6410D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 410 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6410D. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 410) vs 2 MB (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 410	RADEON HD6410D
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 410 draws 100W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 410) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro 410	RADEON HD6410D
TDP	100W	15W-85%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Perf/Watt	4.3	28.2+556%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 410 came in at $149, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35. On MSRP, RADEON HD6410D was 76.5% cheaper ($114 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Quadro 410) vs 12.1 (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 317.2% better value. The newer card here is RADEON HD6410D (2023 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro 410	RADEON HD6410D
MSRP	$149	$35-77%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	12.1+317%
Codename	GK104	Dragon Range
Release	July 23 2013	January 3 2023
Ranking	#604	#843

Search Quadro 410 on Amazon

Search RADEON HD6410D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.