Quadro 410 vs FirePro M2000

Quadro 410

2013Core: 706 MHz

FirePro M2000

2012Core: 800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro 410

100

427

+0.2%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

FirePro M2000

426

0.0%

Radeon HD 6410D

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 410 is positioned at rank 251 and the FirePro M2000 is on rank 323, so the Quadro 410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

99%

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

93%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

90%

#236

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5147%

#251

Quadro 410

MSRP: $149|Avg: $25

100%

#253

FirePro W600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $30

99%

#254

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

95%

#255

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

95%

#256

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

95%

#257

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

93%

#259

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

93%

#260

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

93%

#261

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

92%

#262

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

92%

#264

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

90%

#265

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

87%

#266

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000

#307

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

10404%

#322

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

100%

#323

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

100%

#324

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

98%

#325

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

97%

#326

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

96%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

96%

#328

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

94%

#329

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

92%

#330

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

91%

#331

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

90%

#333

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

89%

#334

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

89%

#335

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

89%

#336

Quadro FX 3450

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

88%

#337

GRID P40-24Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 410 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro 410	FirePro M2000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro 410 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 410 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 100.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro 410	FirePro M2000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+100.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($25)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 410 Benchmark Check

FirePro M2000 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 410 and FirePro M2000

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

FirePro M2000

The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 410 scores 427 and the FirePro M2000 reaches 426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 410 is built on Kepler while the FirePro M2000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro 410) vs 640 (FirePro M2000). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000).

Feature	Quadro 410	FirePro M2000
G3D Mark Score	427	426
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1152+80%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.627 TFLOPS+59%	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	96+140%	40
L1 Cache	96 KB	160 KB+67%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 410	FirePro M2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 410 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M2000 has 1 GB. The FirePro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 410) vs 256 KB (FirePro M2000) — the Quadro 410 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 410	FirePro M2000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 410 draws 100W versus the FirePro M2000's 43W — a 79.7% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 410) vs 350W (FirePro M2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 410	FirePro M2000
TDP	100W	43W-57%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	4.3	9.9+130%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro 410 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the FirePro M2000 launched at $300 and now averages $50. The Quadro 410 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.1 (Quadro 410) vs 8.5 (FirePro M2000) — the Quadro 410 offers 101.2% better value. The Quadro 410 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).