Quadro 410 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro 410

2013Core: 706 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro 410

100

427

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

GeForce GTX 1650

7,869

+1742.9%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 410 is positioned at rank #251 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

99%

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

93%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

90%

#236

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5147%

#251

Quadro 410

MSRP: $149|Avg: $25

100%

#253

FirePro W600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $30

99%

#254

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

95%

#255

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

95%

#256

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

95%

#257

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

93%

#259

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

93%

#260

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

93%

#261

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

92%

#262

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

92%

#264

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

90%

#265

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

87%

#266

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 410 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1742.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 410.

Insight	Quadro 410	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1742.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1742.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $25), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 514.3% better value per dollar than the Quadro 410.

Insight	Quadro 410	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+514.3%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($25)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 410 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 410 and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro 410 scores 427 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1742.9%. The Quadro 410 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro 410) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Quadro 410	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	427	7,869+1743%
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1152+29%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.627 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+83%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96+71%	56
L1 Cache	96 KB	896 KB+833%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 410	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 410 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 410) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 410	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 410 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 410) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro 410	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	4.3	104.9+2340%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro 410 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Quadro 410 costs 66.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.1 (Quadro 410) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 513.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).