Quadro 410 vs Radeon HD 7570M
Quadro 410
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7570M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 410 is positioned at rank 251 and the Radeon HD 7570M is on rank 237, so the Radeon HD 7570M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7570M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 410 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7570M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 410 | Radeon HD 7570M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7570M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7570M holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 64.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 410 | Radeon HD 7570M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 410 and Radeon HD 7570M
Quadro 410
The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Radeon HD 7570M
The Radeon HD 7570M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 421 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 410 scores 427 and the Radeon HD 7570M reaches 421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 410 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7570M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro 410) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7570M). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7570M).
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon HD 7570M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 427+1% | 421 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 1280+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.627 TFLOPS | 2.176 TFLOPS+34% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 320 KB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon HD 7570M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 410 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7570M has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7570M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon HD 7570M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 410 draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 7570M's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 7570M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 410) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7570M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon HD 7570M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3+2% | 4.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7570M costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.1 (Quadro 410) vs 28.1 (Radeon HD 7570M) — the Radeon HD 7570M offers 64.3% better value. The Quadro 410 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon HD 7570M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $15-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.1 | 28.1+64% |
| Codename | GK104 | Wimbledon |
| Release | July 23 2013 | April 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #604 | #531 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 410 and Radeon HD 7570M
