Quadro 410 vs Radeon HD 3850 AGP

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 410 vs Radeon HD 3850 AGP FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 410 vs Radeon HD 3850 AGP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 410

2013

Why buy it

✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
14.6% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3850 AGP

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 410 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 410 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 3850 AGP instead at 432 vs 427, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 410 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 3850 AGP makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19 cheaper on MSRP at $130 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 16% (3.3 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3850 AGP is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 410 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 410 vs Radeon HD 3850 AGP Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon HD 3850 AGP

The Radeon HD 3850 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 410 scores 427 and the Radeon HD 3850 AGP reaches 432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 410 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 3850 AGP uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro 410) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 3850 AGP). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3850 AGP).

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon HD 3850 AGP
G3D Mark Score	427	432+1%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1152+13%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.627 TFLOPS	1.761 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	96 KB	256 KB+167%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 410 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3850 AGP carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 3850 AGP gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 410 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3850 AGP.

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon HD 3850 AGP
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 410 draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 3850 AGP's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro 410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 410) vs 450W (Radeon HD 3850 AGP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon HD 3850 AGP
TDP	100W-23%	130W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	230mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	4.3+30%	3.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 410 came in at $149, while the Radeon HD 3850 AGP launched at $130. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3850 AGP was 12.8% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Quadro 410) vs 3.3 (Radeon HD 3850 AGP) — the Radeon HD 3850 AGP offers 13.8% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 410 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon HD 3850 AGP
MSRP	$149	$130-13%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	3.3+14%
Codename	GK104	Pitcairn
Release	July 23 2013	March 5 2012
Ranking	#604	#503

Search Quadro 410 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 3850 AGP on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.