CPU
GPU
Quadro 410
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 M230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 410 is positioned at rank 251 and the Radeon R5 M230 is on rank 468, so the Quadro 410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M230
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 410 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 M230 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 410 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 410 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 410 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $25), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 410 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 410 and Radeon R5 M230
Quadro 410
The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Radeon R5 M230
The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 410 scores 427 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 410 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro 410) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 427 | 425 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+13% | 1024 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 410 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 has 4 GB. The Radeon R5 M230 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 410 draws 100W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R5 M230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 410) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3 | 5.7+33% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 410 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80 and now averages $25. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.1 (Quadro 410) vs 17.0 (Radeon R5 M230) — the Quadro 410 offers 0.6% better value. The Radeon R5 M230 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro 410 | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $80-46% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.1 | 17.0 |
| Codename | GK104 | Pitcairn |
| Release | July 23 2013 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #604 | #522 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 410 and Radeon R5 M230
