Quadro 410 vs Radeon R5 M230

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 410 vs Radeon R5 M230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 410 vs Radeon R5 M230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 410

2013

Why buy it

✅1.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
86.3% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M230

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 85.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 410 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 410 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (427 vs 425), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 410 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $69 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 85.4% (5.3 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M230 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 410 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 410 vs Radeon R5 M230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon R5 M230

The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 410 scores 427 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 410 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro 410) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon R5 M230
G3D Mark Score	427	425
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1152+13%	1024

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon R5 M230
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 410 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M230 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 410 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M230.

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon R5 M230
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 410 draws 100W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R5 M230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 410) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon R5 M230
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	4.3	5.7+33%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 410 came in at $149, while the Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M230 was 46.3% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Quadro 410) vs 5.3 (Radeon R5 M230) — the Radeon R5 M230 offers 82.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M230 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro 410	Radeon R5 M230
MSRP	$149	$80-46%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	5.3+83%
Codename	GK104	Pitcairn
Release	July 23 2013	June 9 2015
Ranking	#604	#522

Search Quadro 410 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M230 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.