Quadro 410 vs GeForce 800A
Quadro 410
Popular choices:
GeForce 800A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 410 is positioned at rank 251 and the GeForce 800A is on rank 504, so the Quadro 410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 800A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 800A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 410.
| Insight | Quadro 410 | GeForce 800A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 410 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 410 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $30), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 17.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 410 | GeForce 800A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+17.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 410 and GeForce 800A
Quadro 410
The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.
GeForce 800A
The GeForce 800A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 435 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 410 scores 427 and the GeForce 800A reaches 435 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 410 is built on Kepler while the GeForce 800A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro 410) vs 256 (GeForce 800A). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 800A).
| Feature | Quadro 410 | GeForce 800A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 427 | 435+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+350% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.627 TFLOPS+176% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96+500% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 410 | GeForce 800A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 410) vs 1 MB (GeForce 800A) — the GeForce 800A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 410 | GeForce 800A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 410 draws 100W versus the GeForce 800A's 33W — a 100.8% difference. The GeForce 800A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 410) vs 350W (GeForce 800A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro 410 | GeForce 800A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 33W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3 | 13.2+207% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 410 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce 800A launched at $100 and now averages $30. The Quadro 410 costs 16.7% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.1 (Quadro 410) vs 14.5 (GeForce 800A) — the Quadro 410 offers 17.9% better value. The GeForce 800A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro 410 | GeForce 800A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $100-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-17% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.1+18% | 14.5 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM108 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #604 | #832 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 410 and GeForce 800A
