Quadro FX 2800M vs RADEON HD6410D
Quadro FX 2800M
Popular choices:
RADEON HD6410D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 2800M is positioned at rank 106 and the RADEON HD6410D is on rank 340, so the Quadro FX 2800M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2800M
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON HD6410D is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The RADEON HD6410D likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 2800M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD6410D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 2800M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 2800M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON HD6410D remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 2800M and RADEON HD6410D
Quadro FX 2800M
The Quadro FX 2800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 415 points. Launch price was $3,499.
RADEON HD6410D
The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 2800M scores 415 and the RADEON HD6410D reaches 423 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2800M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 415 | 423+2% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+88% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS+10% | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+700% | 4 |
| TMUs | 80+900% | 8 |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 2800M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6410D has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 2800M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 2 MB (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 2800M draws 189W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 170.6% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 28.2+1182% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | RADEON HD6410D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $35 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $5 |
| Codename | GT200B | Dragon Range |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #815 | #843 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 2800M and RADEON HD6410D
