Quadro 410 vs Quadro FX 2800M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 410 vs Quadro FX 2800M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 410 vs Quadro FX 2800M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 410

2013

Why buy it

✅21.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 189W, a 89W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 2800M

2008

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 410 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌89% higher power demand at 189W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 410 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (427 vs 415), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 410 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 410 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro 410 vs Quadro FX 2800M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Quadro FX 2800M

The Quadro FX 2800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 415 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 410 scores 427 and the Quadro FX 2800M reaches 415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 410 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 2800M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro 410) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2800M). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2800M).

Feature	Quadro 410	Quadro FX 2800M
G3D Mark Score	427+3%	415
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1152+380%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.627 TFLOPS+162%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96+20%	80
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 410	Quadro FX 2800M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 410 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2800M carries 1 GB. Quadro FX 2800M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 410 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2800M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 410) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 2800M) — the Quadro 410 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 410	Quadro FX 2800M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 410 draws 100W versus the Quadro FX 2800M's 189W — a 61.6% difference. The Quadro 410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 410) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 410	Quadro FX 2800M
TDP	100W-47%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	4.3+95%	2.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 410 (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro 410	Quadro FX 2800M
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	GK104	GT200B
Release	July 23 2013	November 11 2008
Ranking	#604	#815

Search Quadro 410 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 2800M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.