
Quadro FX 2800M

Radeon R5 M230
Quadro FX 2800M vs Radeon R5 M230 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 2800M vs Radeon R5 M230 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 2800M vs Radeon R5 M230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 2800M
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M230 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.
Radeon R5 M230
2015Why buy it
- ✅19.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 2800M vs Radeon R5 M230 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 2800M
The Quadro FX 2800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 415 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R5 M230
The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 2800M scores 415 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2800M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 415 | 425+2% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1024+327% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 2800M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M230 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2800M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M230.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 2800M draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon R5 M230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 75W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 5.7+159% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R5 M230 (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $80 |
| Codename | GT200B | Pitcairn |
| Release | November 11 2008 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #815 | #522 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














