FirePro M2000 vs Quadro FX 2800M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M2000 vs Quadro FX 2800M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M2000 vs Quadro FX 2800M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M2000

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 43W instead of 189W, a 146W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 2800M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌339.5% higher power demand at 189W vs 43W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro M2000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (426 vs 415), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro M2000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro M2000 vs Quadro FX 2800M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M2000

The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

Quadro FX 2800M

The Quadro FX 2800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 415 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the Quadro FX 2800M reaches 415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 2800M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2800M). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2800M).

Feature	FirePro M2000	Quadro FX 2800M
G3D Mark Score	426+3%	415
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	640+167%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS+65%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M2000	Quadro FX 2800M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M2000 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2800M.

Feature	FirePro M2000	Quadro FX 2800M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the Quadro FX 2800M's 189W — a 125.9% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro M2000	Quadro FX 2800M
TDP	43W-77%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.9+350%	2.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro M2000 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	FirePro M2000	Quadro FX 2800M
MSRP	$300	—
Codename	Heathrow	GT200B
Release	July 1 2012	November 11 2008
Ranking	#710	#815

Search FirePro M2000 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 2800M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.