RADEON HD6410D vs Quadro 410

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON HD6410D is positioned at rank 340 and the Quadro 410 is on rank 251, so the Quadro 410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD6410D

#330

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

898%

#332

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

814%

#333

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

812%

#337

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

738%

#338

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

733%

#340

RADEON HD6410D

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

100%

#341

GeForce 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

100%

#342

Radeon R7 M465X

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#344

GeForce 830A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

97%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

94%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

92%

#350

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

92%

#351

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

92%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

99%

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

93%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

90%

#236

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5147%

#251

Quadro 410

MSRP: $149|Avg: $25

100%

#253

FirePro W600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $30

99%

#254

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

95%

#255

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

95%

#256

L2

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

95%

#257

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

93%

#259

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

93%

#260

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

93%

#261

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

92%

#262

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

92%

#264

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

90%

#265

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

87%

#266

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON HD6410D is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The RADEON HD6410D likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 410 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 410 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON HD6410D.

Insight	RADEON HD6410D	Quadro 410
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON HD6410D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $25 for the Quadro 410, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 395.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON HD6410D	Quadro 410
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+395.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($5)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON HD6410D Benchmark Check

Quadro 410 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON HD6410D and Quadro 410

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

Quadro 410

The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON HD6410D scores 423 and the Quadro 410 reaches 427 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON HD6410D is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410).

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	Quadro 410
G3D Mark Score	423	427
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	128	1152+800%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5632 TFLOPS	1.627 TFLOPS+189%
ROPs	4	32+700%
TMUs	8	96+1100%
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	Quadro 410
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RADEON HD6410D) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 410) — the RADEON HD6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	Quadro 410
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON HD6410D draws 15W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD6410D) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON HD6410D	Quadro 410
TDP	15W-85%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	28.2+556%	4.3

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON HD6410D launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Quadro 410 launched at $149 and now averages $25. The RADEON HD6410D costs 80% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 84.6 (RADEON HD6410D) vs 17.1 (Quadro 410) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 394.7% better value. The RADEON HD6410D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).